AWS Consumer Complaint Intelligence Dashboard

North Carolina Credit Card Fees & Interest Analysis

An undergraduate data analytics portfolio project by ChieNwosu — demonstrating AWS cloud architecture design, SQL analysis, Python data pipelines, and stakeholder reporting using real CFPB consumer complaint data.

AWS Status: The pipeline (S3 → Glue → Athena → QuickSight) is a designed architecture and has not been deployed. All analysis results are from the local Python implementation.


Project Overview

This project analyzes 542 CFPB consumer complaints from North Carolina related to credit card fees and interest charges (January 2024 – April 2026). The analysis identifies complaint concentration patterns, company response behavior, and consumer friction themes — and validates AI-generated insights against the actual data.

View full project on GitHub →


Architecture Summary

complaints.csv → Amazon S3 → AWS Glue Data Catalog → Amazon Athena → QuickSight
                                                                          ↓
                                                                   GitHub Pages
Stage Service Purpose Status
Storage Amazon S3 Raw CSV storage Designed
Catalog AWS Glue Schema registration Designed
Query Amazon Athena SQL analysis Designed
Dashboard Amazon QuickSight Interactive visuals Designed
Docs GitHub Pages This site ✅ Live
Local analysis Python + pandas All results shown here ✅ Implemented

Full architecture documentation →


Key KPIs

Metric Value
Total complaints 542
Companies involved 42
Top company Synchrony Financial — 123 complaints (22.7%)
Top sub-issue Problem with fees — 355 complaints (65.5%)
Monetary relief rate 31.2% (169 complaints)
Timely response rate 99.6% (540 of 542)
Narrative availability 62.2% (337 of 542)
Peak complaint month March 2026 — 38 complaints

Dashboard Preview

Complaint Volume by Company (Top 10)

Complaint Volume by Company

Sub-Issue Distribution

Sub-Issue Distribution

Monthly Complaint Trend

Monthly Complaint Trend

Company Response Outcomes

Company Response Outcomes


Key Insights

  1. Synchrony Financial dominates — 123 complaints, 1.7× more than the next company
  2. Fee disputes are primary — 65.5% of complaints are about specific fee problems
  3. Monetary relief is meaningful — 31.2% of consumers received financial compensation
  4. Near-perfect compliance — 99.6% timely response rate across all companies
  5. Plain language prevails — “fee” (229) and “interest” (197) dominate narratives; “APR” appears only 14 times
  6. March 2026 spike — 38 complaints in one month, nearly double the average of 19.4

AI Validation Summary

AI-generated insights from a prior analysis were tested against the actual dataset. 3 of 8 insights were rejected.

Insight Status
Synchrony Financial is the top source ✅ Accepted
“Problem with fees” dominates ✅ Accepted
99%+ timely response rate ✅ Accepted
Most complaints closed without monetary relief ✅ Accepted
Complaint spikes in early calendar year ⚠️ Partially Accepted
“Promotional rate” is a common narrative theme ❌ Rejected — 0 occurrences
Consumers frequently mention “APR” ❌ Rejected — only 14 occurrences
Monetary relief is rare (under 10%) ❌ Rejected — actual rate is 31.2%

Full AI validation log →


Documentation

Section Description
Project Overview Component status and key findings
Business Problem Why this analysis matters
Data Dictionary All 18 columns defined
AWS Architecture Designed cloud pipeline with cost estimates
Dashboard Requirements QuickSight design specs
Insights Chart-by-chart business interpretations
AI Validation Log 8 insights validated against real data
Limitations Dataset and methodology limitations
Stakeholder Summary Non-technical findings and recommendations

SQL Files

File Purpose
01 — Create Athena Table External table from S3 CSV
02 — Data Quality Checks Row count, nulls, date range, ZIP masking
03 — KPI Queries All core KPIs
04 — Company Response Analysis Per-company response and relief rates
05 — Sub-Issue Trend Analysis Trends by month, company, and year
06 — Semantic Views 4 dashboard-ready CREATE VIEW statements

How to Run Locally

git clone https://github.com/ChieNwosu/aws-consumer-complaint-intelligence.git
cd aws-consumer-complaint-intelligence
pip install -r requirements.txt

# Run from project root:
python src/data_cleaning.py
python src/analysis.py
python src/visualization.py

All findings derived from the CFPB public complaint database. Dataset: 542 North Carolina credit card fee and interest complaints, January 2024 – April 2026.